Cosmos Project
FOR A LOCAL OBSERVER, ALL PROPERTIES OF PHYSICS ARE THE SAME
Cosmic Physics
1. Density Paradox
Contrary to popular belief fueled by abstract mathematical models, a black hole is not necessarily an object of infinite density. Rigorous analysis of mass gradients reveals a counterintuitive physical reality: the average density of a black hole is inversely proportional to the square of its mass.
While theoretical micro-black holes exhibit colossal densities, supermassive black holes display average densities comparable to air—or even lower than water. This technical fact, often overlooked, physically invalidates the central "singularity" hypothesis. Nature does not divide by zero; it distributes mass within an available volume.
2. Structural Conservation and Fluid Mechanics
In Ethon-Space theory, the black hole is reconsidered as a "saturated star" rather than a bottomless pit. Infalling matter undergoes no fundamental destruction but orbital insertion. The process resembles controlled atmospheric reentry:
Tangential Vector: Any object approaching the horizon with the correct critical angle inserts into the black hole's rotational flow.
Zero Relative Velocity: Through entrainment by the Éthonic medium (space's "fabric"), the object synchronizes its velocity with peripheral layers. No destructive head-on impact occurs, but laminar integration.
3. Peripheral Assembly
The black hole grows by peripheral accretion, layer by layer. Far from an information shredder, it acts as a dense storage mechanism. It proves matter's geometric structure can withstand extreme compression states—as at a black hole's center—without losing coherence, validating Ethon-Space's fluid and elastic nature.
BLACK HOLES
(Translated & Verified for genesis1.net)
1. Inverse Mass-Density Relation
Density (ρρ) = mass / volume. For black holes, volume derives from Schwarzschild radius (RsRs), the event horizon limit:
Rs=2GMc2Rs=c22GM
Volume scales as V∝R3V∝R3, yielding:
ρ≈MRs3∝MM3∝1M2ρ≈Rs3M∝M3M∝M21
Critical conclusion: Black hole density inversely proportional to mass squared. Doubling mass quarters density.
2. Scale Comparison (Fixed Table)
Illustrating density variance across black hole types:
TypeMass (approx.)Horizon RadiusDensity (approx.)ComparisonMicro (Theoretical)Earth mass~9 mm2×10302×1030 kg/m³Beyond nuclearStellar10 M☉~30 km10171017 kg/m³Atomic nucleusSupermassive (M87*)6.5B M☉~20B km~1 kg/m³Air density!
Key note: Supermassive BHs (Milky Way center, M87) so vast, redistributed mass yields water-like (or lower) density
3. Why "Small" Ones Are So Dense
Stellar (smaller) BHs compress matter into tiny volumes, exceeding neutron star densities. Tidal forces destroy well before horizon. Hypothetical primordial BHs: microscopic, densities beyond Standard Model sans quantum gravity.
Proton Radius Puzzle & Density
Data (Charge Radius)
Proton radius revised post-2010 muonic hydrogen experiments ("Proton Radius Puzzle"):
Mass (mm): ≈1.67×10−27≈1.67×10−27 kg
Radius (rr): ≈0.84≈0.84 fm (0.84×10−150.84×10−15 m) [? context]
Calculation (spherical approximation):
V=43πr3≈2.48×10−45 m3V=34πr3≈2.48×10−45m3
ρ=mV≈6.7×1017 kg/m3ρ=Vm≈6.7×1017kg/m3
Perspective:
670 quadrillion × water density.
1 cm³ proton matter ≈ 600–700 million tons (all US cars in a thimble).
Matches neutron star density (giant atomic nucleus).
BH Link: Proton density phenomenal but insufficient for BH. Needs compression to 10−5410−54 m radius (10391039× smaller).

